Category Archives: Drama

Anything Can Happen In The Woods…

2015/01/img_0180.jpg
Into The Woods, 2014

Before I write my review I must confess – whilst I am a huge Steven Sondheim fan and have loved this musical since I first heard Bernadette Peters sing Children Will Listen (and had the original broadway cast recording playing in my car for a looooong time) – I have never had the privilege of seeing it performed live. I had no preconceived notions of what to expect, other than the music. However, given the casting choices of relatively popular/well known actors in the lead roles, rather than actors from the musical theatre community, I went in with fairly low expectations.

I have to say straight up, I thoroughly enjoyed this film. I was pleasantly surprised by the majority of the cast – Meryl Streep‘s voice has improved a great deal since I first heard her sing in Mamma Mia, and her Witch was a good blend of tortured and psychotic; Emily Blunt was a delightful surprise as the Baker’s Wife, both her singing and facial expressions; having loved James Corden in Doctor Who, I had no idea what to expect here either and I wasn’t disappointed with him as The Baker, he and Blunt worked very well together; Johnny Depp, whilst not having the greatest voice in the world, was delightfully creepy as The Wolf; and the most pleasant surprise of all was Chris Pine as Cinderella’s Prince. Again Pine’s singing isn’t the greatest, but the way he plays the prince is perfect (in some scenes almost seeming to channel William Shatner), his and Billy Magnusson‘s performance of Agony was hilarious. Whilst I wasn’t surprised by Anna Kendrick‘s performance (having seen her in singing roles before), I did enjoy her Cinderella. The children who play Jack (Daniel HuttlestoneLes Misérables) and Little Red Riding Hood (Lilla Crawford) also gave very strong performances.

Director Rob Marshall seemed to keep special effects to a relative minimum (given what can be done on film these days), keeping it much like a stage production – a great decision in my view. Costuming was also beautiful, as was the use of Sondheim’s typically discordant score. Marshall was an interesting choice for director – whilst he is not a particularly prolific director, four of the eight features he has directed have been film adaptations of musicals (Annie, Chicago & Nine), which met with varied success.

Whilst I did thoroughly enjoy Into The Woods, there were some disappointments. The major disappointment, as is almost always the case with musical theatre adaptations, was cuts to the original score. As is common to many of Sondheim’s musicals, the main themes of this musical are the complexities of relationships and the human condition, as well as the everlasting struggle of good versus evil and right versus wrong. As the majority of cuts seemed to be in Act 2, some of the depth and profundity of this musical seemed to be lost. But for me, the biggest loss was the cutting of the Agony Reprise – especially given the fantastic audience response to Chris Pine and Billy Magnusson’s performance.

If you don’t enjoy the spontaneous singing of musical theatre or the somewhat unconventional harmonies of Sondheim’s scores, I wouldn’t recommend this film. Otherwise, suspend your disbelief and go for it!


Do you know what a Fugazi is?

image

The Wolf of Wall Street, 2013

Mark Hanna: “Nobody knows if a stock is going to go up, down, sideways or in circles. You know what a Fugazi is?”
Jordan Belfort: “Fugazi, it’s a fake.”
Mark Hanna: “Fugazi, Fugazi. It’s a wazy. It’s a woozie. It’s fairy dust.”

I had heard so many conflicting reviews of this movie that by the time I actually watched it last night, I had no expectations of what this film was going to be, which is really how I like to go into films.  The Wolf of Wall Street is like Wall Street, Mad Men and The Hangover combined and then on steroids (or crack to be more appropriate). It is a how-to manual on getting caught up in all the excesses of stock broking in the 80s and 90s – the money, the women, and the drugs.

It clearly shows that power and money are true corruptors – Belfort started out starry eyed and wanting to make money for both broker and client. How rapidly things changed when he saw an opportunity to make some big bucks.

If it wasn’t so obscene and disrespectful towards the clients, women and human beings in general, I’d recommend parts of WOWS for sales training in all kinds of industries, not just the financial sector – which is what Belfort ended up doing for a living after his ’empire’ collapsed. Belfort is clearly a born salesperson – he understands the basic principle of getting the customer to see value in what you’re trying to sell, and he does it whilst oozing charisma.

Some people have said that WOWS glorifies the behavior of brokers during these decades, but I don’t agree.  This movie clearly illustrates to me the debauched behavior, the consequences that some (not all – we have to have realism folks) faced, and why the GFC happened.  Martin Scorsese achieves this with a sense of humor – without the comic aspect you’d just want to cry at what awful human beings these characters are. I’m still not sure how they all functioned given just how many drugs were in their systems – but I guess if you’re taking uppers and downers it levels you out in a way – surely their cognitive function was compromised.

There are definitely some stand out performances in WOWS – Leonardo Dicaprio hits the mark yet again as Jordan Belfort.  He is charismatic, engaging and headstrong, making it easier to understand how he had so many people eating out of his hands. Jonah Hill is also surprising in this largely non-comic role as Belfort’s second in command, Donnie Azoff.  Margot Robbie is brilliant – her command of the Brooklyn accent is an achievement in itself.  She is a stunning, just plain hot young woman, but she is much more than a pretty face, playing Naomi Lapaglia with strength and confidence, absolutely shining in a role that can’t have been easy surrounded by such powerhouse actors.

Even the smaller, almost cameo roles are played brilliantly. Matthew McConaughey plays the off the wall inspiration for Belfort’s career, Mark Hanna. McConaughey is getting better and better, he is so much more than the pretty romantic lead that he was in his early career. Joanna Lumley plays Naomi’s Aunt Emma and one of Belfort’s partners in money-laundering crime. And star of The Artist, Jean Dujardin plays Belfort’s Swiss Banker with his unique brand of charm and charisma.

Overall, if you enjoy films/shows like Wall Street, Mad Men and The Hangover that fully display the obscene, debauched dark side of humanity but treat it with a bit of humor, you should enjoy this film. If you like your movies to leave you feeling good and seeing the bright side to humanity – I don’t think this film is for you.


To Horrify or Not to Horrify That is the Question…

image

The Rite, 2011

Another exorcism film based on real events (is it just me or are there a troubling number of these?!) directed by Mikael Håfström.

I was mostly drawn to this film because I have a bit of a crush on Colin O’Donoghue (Captain Hook/Killian Jones in Once Upon a Time) and I’m generally a fan of Anthony Hopkins.  While it wasn’t entirely what I was expecting, it was a somewhat intriguing and entertaining film.

Colin O’Donoghue plays Michael Kovak, the son of an undertaker (Rutger Hauer).  It doesn’t bode well for him that Michael has one of two career choices ahead of him – undertaker or priest. He chooses what he considers to be the lesser of two evils – becoming a priest. After 4 Years of training as a priest, Michael is thinking of quitting, but Father Matthew (Toby Jones) recognizes his potential and encourages him to travel to Italy to do a course in exorcism.

A keen student of psychology, Michael is clearly sceptical about demonic possession and isn’t overly secure in his faith in general. He is running away from his past into a future that he’s not so sure about either.

Michael is not convinced of the presence of demons and deep down thinks that believing in them gives ‘them’ (the victim’s psychosis) power.  However, he is introduced to an experienced exorcist by the name of Father Lucas Trevent who proceeds to show Michael how exorcisms are performed.  Hopkins plays the wonderfully tormented ‘less conventional’ priest Father Lucas, and Ciarán Hinds is suitably severe as the ‘exorcist trainer’ Father Xavier. 

I must admit I watched this film expecting to be scared in the usual exorcism horror movie way.  This film is less a horror film and more a film about a young man rediscovering his faith and it just happens to involve some very clichéd possessed people and exorcisms.  As a non – religious person I enjoyed Michael’s skepticism even in the face of things that looked clearly supernatural to the audience.  He manages to explain almost everything that happens using psychology. He is skeptical to the point that even I was thinking “Come on! It’s clear she’s possessed, just deal with it!”.  However, I was also a bit disappointed by how quickly and drastically his views changed.

Overall I enjoyed the film as more of a study in human nature and what motivates our decisions, than as a genuine horror movie. Don’t expect big scares in this one.


A Place of Perfect Bliss or One of the Seven Levels of Hell?

20130822-091905.jpg

Elysium, 2013

*Warning* – slight political rant ahead…

All I knew about Elysium upon walking into the cinema was that it was written and directed by the same director as the alien ‘apartheid’ film District 9 – South African born Neill Blomkamp – and stars Matt Damon. I hadn’t read or heard many reviews or seen many previews for it – but that was enough for me to get out and see it, even whilst trying to fight off a head cold. I have no regrets at all.

The film is a terrifying and beautiful depiction of the best and worst aspects of human nature, and where we could end up if we don’t learn from our mistakes quick smart.

Kick your imagination into gear for a moment – no matter how over or underused it is. Imagine, if you will, that you have nothing but the clothes on your back. The single room ramshackle hut that you live in is built from whatever materials you can find, and has minimal amenities or basic conveniences such as water, electricity or plumbing.

Try to imagine a place where no matter how hard you work, no matter what you do, you will never achieve a better quality of life. You will live in that hut, and possibly suffer from various illnesses or disabilities that cause serious pain, discomfort or eventual death. You are surrounded by brutality, violence and an utter disrespect for human life.

Now imagine that you’ve heard of a place where all of your illnesses could be cured easily, where people live in large comfortable homes with lawns and swimming pools and landscaping. Where all your fears of violence, famine, sickness and death would be a thing of the past. What would you do? What would you give to get to that place? Would you save up every cent you earn, give it to some dodgy looking guy with an equally dodgy looking ship, so that you could get your family to that place, where they might – just might – have a chance at a better, happier and possibly longer life? Answer honestly now…

If I stopped the description there, it could be describing the existence of countless people in war torn and famine ravaged countries in the world right now. However, in this film…

This is the position that the citizens of Earth in the year 2154 find themselves – the Earth is diseased and polluted beyond recognition and the wealthy have deserted the planet for an idyllic space station in the sky. A space station called Elysium (from Greek mythology meaning ‘any place or state of perfect happiness; paradise’) where they can keep their perfect way of life close and the filthy diseased, poor at more than an arms length. On Elysium they have med-bays that can cure anything from broken bones to leukemia to reconstructing a grenade damaged face. There is no sign of poverty, unhappiness or disease. There is, however, an undercurrent of unpleasantness brought about by Minister Delacourt played by Jodie Foster, a staunch anti-immigration politician who will go to appalling lengths to ‘stop the boats’.

To me, as an Australian suffering in the intellectual void that is Australian politics at the moment, this really hit close to home. For those readers who are not Australian, or who may have been living under a rock, asylum seekers/refugees/boat people have been a hot issue during the current election campaign. If you are undecided about the issue, or if you have difficulty understanding why a person might risk their lives and the lives of their family by getting on a leaky boat only to end up dead or if they’re ‘lucky’ in a detention centre on Christmas Island – I would recommend seeing this film. It’s a slightly more extreme situation, but effective nonetheless.

Even bigger than the refugee issue is that of the future of this planet that we call home. It seems to me that Neill Blomkamp has a very clear vision for where the world is headed if we don’t change our ways very soon, and it isn’t pretty. Abandoning the planet because we’ve made a mess of it is not an option folks – we need to seize the best side of our humanity with both hands, and pull together as the Human race, rather than fighting amongst ourselves and destroying our own future.

I really enjoyed this film, it is visually stunning – both the scenes on Earth and Elysium – and the performances from all the cast are excellent, especially the ‘villains’ who are wonderfully chilling in their disregard for the lives of the poor – special mention to Sharlto Copley who plays an absolutely insane assassin/mercenary to perfection. However, it does miss some potential opportunities for more depth to the story line. I would have liked to see more detail of the lives of the citizens living on Elysium – but the lack of information does seem to add to the mysterious, illusive, and unattainable nature of the paradise that is the space station. A bit more character development wouldn’t have gone astray either – however there are time restrictions. Not every director wants to make the audience sit through 3-4 hours of sometimes unnecessary detail. A quick note for those reviewers who whine about not seeing much of Elysium itself or its people, do you think it’s possible you may have missed the fact that Bomkamp was possibly keeping it at a distance to help the audience develop empathy for those remaining on Earth, rather than encouraging the audience to covet life on a pretty space station? Just a thought.

If you enjoyed District 9, chances are you’ll like this film. It’s a dark and bleak vision for the future, but it’s hopeful as well.


Finally the Return to Old-school Horror!

20130725-000208.jpg

The Conjuring, 2013

*Warning* – if you’re not a fan of horror, if you don’t love to be bat-shit scared, DO NOT see this film.

Finally a decent return to the real horror genre. With tastes from classics like The Exorcist and Amityville Horror, this film will scare the pants off you!

As with most of the best horror classics, The Conjuring is set in the 1970s when exorcisms seemed to be slightly more commonplace (?) and houses in Connecticut were über isolated and surrounded by woods (oh hang on they still are!). The story centers around two families, the Warrens and the Perrons. The Warrens are a couple of demonologists with a young daughter, who spend their time investigating paranormal/unusual phenomena and occasionally assist with exorcisms. The Perrons are a family of seven (5 daughters) who have just moved to their new home in a beautiful wooded area in Connecticut – beautiful, isolated and haunted.

Again, as with most great horror films, this one opens with the simple newsprint type pre-amble telling us about the Warrens, and that this is based on true events that were so terrifying that they’ve been kept secret for many years.

This film is brilliant for several reasons – including the scares, the casting, and the filming/editing. The scares are what separates this movie from the basic “scary movie” and brings it into the horror genre. There isn’t any over reliance on CGI , they simply rely on your fear of things that go bump in the night, that something behind the door, or under the bed. They begin subtly, and for the connoisseur of the genre, just when you think you know there’ll be a scare, there’s that false sense of security, and then BAM they hit you when you weren’t expecting it. As always, the sound track is integral to the success of horror.

Patrick Wilson plays Ed Warren, the only non-priest demonologist to be recognised by the Catholic church. Wilson plays a character who could come across as tortured with great strength. Vera Farmiga plays Lorraine Warren, the talented clairvoyant wife of Ed and an important part of their team. Farmiga is stunning as always with a gentleness and tenderness yet a strength to her character. The Perrons – especially Lili Taylor as Carolyn Perron – were perfect. Even the skeptical cop was just right.

The filming/editing make a massive difference to how a movie can come across. The use of unusual camera angles during particular scenes allowed the audience to empathize more that usual with the feelings of fear and disorientation that the characters were experiencing.

I was expecting to be scared by this movie, I enjoy being scared by horror movies – I was not disappointed. Take a friend or loved one along to see this movie, you’ll need someone to cling on to!


The Great Gatsby

20130620-232955.jpg
The Great Gatsby, 2013

Gatsby – in a word? Magnificent. Beautiful film making with, in my view, the most effective use of 3D I’ve seen in a long time. The most wonderful set and costume design – Catherine Martin is a genius. And the casting was perfect. Leonardo DiCaprio just gets better and better, Carey Mulligan was stunning, and Joel Edgerton was wonderfully horrible. I came out of the movie feeling like Jay Gatsby was one of the saddest, yet hopeful and courageous literary characters. Baz Luhrmann – I take my hat off to you, you are a visionary and genius in the cinematic world, and you have made our world richer.

Luhrmann’s films aren’t for everyone. I know there are those who call this film boring or too over the top, and those who simply refuse to see it because it was directed by Baz Luhrmann. If you don’t like your cinema colorful, visually rich and full of nuance hidden in the layers of excess, you might not like this movie – but open your mind, let go of your preconceptions and see where the film takes you. You might just like it!